AMRITA SINHA
Pushpa Devi Jain – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Revenue, Bureau of Investigation – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
AMRITA SINHA, J.
1. The petitioner challenges the order passed by the adjudicating authority under Section 129(3) of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the order affirming the same by the appellate authority.
2. The goods of the petitioner were found moving without a valid e-way bill. The vehicle was intercepted, inspected and thereafter detained as the person in charge of the goods failed to produce a valid e-way bill. The goods were later released upon payment of penalty.
3. A show cause notice was issued and opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner. The proposed penalty was accepted and paid by the tax payer on 25th April, 2022 without raising any objection. The adjudicating authority, in the absence of any objection, confirmed the penalty.
4. On 18th July, 2022, an appeal was preferred. The said appeal was considered and rejected on 31st August, 2022.
5. Learned advocate for the petitioner contends that the imposition of penalty is illegal as the petitioner did not have any deliberate intention to evade tax. The vehicle in question suffered a breakdown in the course of journey and the same had to be repaired prior to resuming movement. The e-way
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.