JUDGMENT :

1. Affidavit-of-service filed in Court be kept with the records.

2. By consent of the parties, both the appeals and the connected applications are taken up together for hearing and are disposed of by this common judgment and order as both the appeals are directed against the same order.

3. The appellants in these two appeals were not parties to the writ petition before the learned Single Judge. They say that they are vitally affected by the interim order dated June 29, 2021 passed in W.P.A. 9912 of 2021. They have come to know of the said order only on September 21, 2022. Immediately, they have approached us with applications for leave to appeal and applications for condonation of delay.

In re : CAN 1 of 2022 (in MAT 1621 of 2022) & CAN 2 of 2022 (in MAT 1620 of 2022)

4. Having heard learned counsel for the appellants, we are satisfied that this is a fit case where leave to appeal should be granted to the appellants as they would be affected by the order sought to be challenged before us.

5. CAN 1 of 2022 (in MAT 1621 of 2022) and CAN 2 of 2022 (in MAT 1620 of 2022) are, accordingly, disposed of.

In re : CAN 2 of 2022 (in MAT 1621 of 2022) & CAN 3 of 2022 (in MAT 1620 of 2022)

6