AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE
Sudhanghsu Mohan Roy, Since deceased, represented by Smt. Jyotirmoyee Roy – Appellant
Versus
Haradhan Roy, since deceased, represented by Smt. Manju Roy – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.
1. This second appeal has been assailed against Judgment and decree passed in Title Appeal No. 81 of 1983 reversing the judgment and decree passed by Munshiff, 2nd Court, Serampore in Title Suit No. 48 of 1983. Division Bench of this court while admitting present second appeal, Their Lordship pleased to held that the second appeal will be heard on the grounds set out in the memo of Appeal. In the Memo of Appeal total 17 (seventeen) grounds have been set out.
2. During the course of hearing the learned counsel appearing on behalf of Appellants assailed the judgment of the court below mainly on two grounds.
(ii) A co-sharer in an undivided property cannot construct a building without obtaining consent from other co-sharers.
3. The dispute which cropped up over the subject matter relates to land described in “ka” schedule to the plaint comprising of plot no. 1097, 1099 and “kha” schedule to the plaint comprising of plot no. 1262,1088,1100 of Mouza-Samil, District-Hooghly.
4. The appellants herein as plaintiffs filed aforesaid Title
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.