Back
SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA
CAMAC Leathers Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
State Of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.
1. Respondent no. 5, one Sass Med Private Limited, runs a clinical establishment at Premise No. 195/1, Park Street, P.S. – Beniapukur, Kol – 700 017. The said respondent is a lessee under the petitioners since 2021. The petitioners alleged that respondent no. 5 has violated all fire safety norms and has suffered a Notice under Section 5 of the West Bengal Fire Services Act, 1950 (for short, “the 1950 Act”).
2. It is argued that such violation of norms jeopardizes the interests of the petitioners/owners, who also apprehend liability and legal action in that regard from the respondent-Authorities.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners places reliance on a Notification dated September 4, 2012 annexed at page 81 of the writ petition, issued by the Principal Secretary, Government of West Bengal, Health and Family Welfare Department, by which all clinical establishments were directed to submit either of the documents specified therein, one of which was No Objection Certificate/clearance certificate issued by the Fire and Emergency Services Department of the Government of West Bengal.
4. Learned counsel also relies on the Notice under Section 35 of
The judgment establishes the principle that vicarious liability of officers in charge of a company requires specific averments and proof of their responsibility for the conduct of the company's busin....
Building Use Permission - Section 268 of GPMC Act empowers Commissioner to order any building or any portion thereof to be vacated by giving written notice, if such building or a portion thereof has ....
The issuance of a Certificate of Fitness for Occupation serves as conclusive proof of compliance with building regulations, and the burden of proof for negligence rests on the Appellant.
(1) Rules applicable to High Rise Buildings cannot be applied to buildings which are not High Rise Buildings – SDMC cannot keep sanction of Revised Building Plan submitted by Appellant in abeyance in....
The court emphasized that running a clinical establishment without a valid license is illegal, and the State must act to prevent unauthorized medical practices, which endanger public health.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
