SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Cal) 414

HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA
Samir Halder – Appellant
Versus
Dipak Halder – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Biswaroop Biswas Mrs. Atryeee De (Ganguly)
For the Respondent: Mr. Debdipto Banerjee

JUDGMENT :

HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.

1. The order dated 27th July, 2023 passed by the learned Civil Judge, (Junior Division), Additional Court, Sealdah in Title Suit No. 247 of 2019 is under challenge in this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India at the instance of the plaintiff.

2. By the order impugned, the application under section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying for stay of all further proceedings of Title Suit No. 247 of 2019 till the disposal of the Revocation Case No. 1 of 2019 was allowed.

3. Mr. Biswas, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the suit for recovery of possession, upon revocation of license, could not have been stayed till the disposal of the revocation proceeding as the nature and character of the two proceedings are not identical. He further submits that the suit for eviction being an earlier proceeding cannot be stayed under section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure on the ground of pendency of a revocation proceeding.

4. Mr. Biswas places reliance upon a decision of a coordinate Bench delivered on 23rd August, 2010 in C.O. 1895 of 2010 in support of his contention that eviction proceeding cannot be stayed du

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top