SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Cal) 703

JAY SENGUPTA
Pradeep Kumar Halder – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rakesh Pal Gobind.
For the Respondent: Ms. A.S. Zinu

JUDGMENT :

Jay Sengupta, J.

1. This is a revisional application challenging an appellate order of conviction and sentence dated 29.12.2023 passed in an appeal preferred by the petitioner being Criminal Appeal No.7 of 2023 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge at Mayabunder thereby affirming the Trial Court’s Judgment dated 23.03.2022 passed in CR Case No.15 of 2014 convicting the petitioner-accused and another to suffer simple imprisonment for a term of 3 years for each of the offences along with the fine of Rs.30,000/-to be paid by each of the convicts punishable under Sections 9, 39(3) and 40 (2) of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, the sentences having to run simultaneously.

2. A complaint case was filed before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Mayabunder under Sections 2, 9, 39(3), 50, 51 and 40 (2) of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 with the allegations that on 01.12.2013 at about 3.20 hours the Range Officer, Bakultala received a secret information about illegal hunting, possession and illegal trading of Wildlife Scheduled Species at Tikka Dera. The Range Officer along with team rushed to the house of the petitioner with search warrant and made search in presence

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top