Back
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
DEBANGSU BASAK, MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI, JJ.
Basanta Das – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal & ors. – Respondents
WPA 2613 of 2018
Decided on : 17-01-2024
Candidates - Employment Dispute - The court heard representations from advocates representing successful candidates in various classes and groups, and scheduled further proceedings for a later date.
Fact of the Case:
The court heard representations from advocates representing successful candidates in various classes and groups.
Finding of the Court:
The court scheduled further proceedings for a later date.
Issues:
Ratio Decidendi:
Final Decision:
JUDGMENT :
1. We heard Mr. Anindya Mitra, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the successful candidates in Classes IX, X and Group-C matters.
2. On his conclusion, we heard Mr. Utkarsh Kaushik, learned Advocate appearing in support of the successful Group-D candidates and in employment in item nos. 149 and 151.
3. On his conclusion, we heard Mr. Mukul Lahiri, learned Senior Advocate for the successful Group-C candidates and in employment.
4. On his conclusion, we heard Mr. Jaydip Kar, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the successful candidates of classes IX and X.
5. Mr. Jayanta Mitra, learned Senior Advocate commences his submissions and does not conclude today.
6. List the matters on January 18, 2024.
The court's decision emphasized the importance of filing affidavits, representation of advocates, and scheduling of the next hearing in the case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the violation of natural justice and the failure to consider all relevant facts and materials in reaching the decision.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
