KRISHNA RAO
Khaitan India Limited – Appellant
Versus
Khaitar Industries Private Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Krishna Rao, J.
1. The plaintiff has filed the instant application for grant of injunction restraining the defendant and each of them, their servants, agents, assigns, distributors, stockists, dealers and all others acting for and on their behalf from any way or manner infringing the plaintiff’s trademarks “KHAITAN” and any other words or get up identical or deceptively similar to the plaintiff’s trademark and other reliefs.
2. The plaintiff is engaged in the business of trading and marketing of domestic and industrial fans, pumps, industrial products and appliances since 1970 and since then, the plaintiff has excelled in its business of trading and marketing of its products. The products of the plaintiff have been synonymous with excellent quality of fans and other products in India. The plaintiff’s goods have acquired immense goodwill and reputation in the market.
3. In order to built up a brand of its own and to distinguish its products with the other products in the market, in the year 1970, the plaintiff coined and adopted an innovative and distinctive mark, being “KHAITAN” with the word “KHAITAN’ written in red colour in a stylized manner and a visual representation of
James Chadwick & Bros. Ltd. v. The National Sewing Thread Co.
Products Refining Co. v. Shangrila Food Products Ltd. reported in AIR 1960 SC 142
Amritdhara Pharmacy v. Satya Deo Gupta reported in AIR 1963 SC 449
Parle Products (P) Ltd. v. J.P. and Co.
Renaissance Hotel Holdings Inc. v. B. Vijaya Sai reported in (2022) 5 SCC 1
Kaviraj Pandit Durga Dutt Sharma v. Navaratna Pharmaceutical Laboratories (AIR 1965 SC 980
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.