RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY
Utpal Das – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J.
1. Although, the affidavit in opposition has been filed belatedly at the time of hearing, however, for ends of justice the same is taken on record.
2. The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, challenging the order dated 8th April, 2021, passed under Section 73 of the Central/West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”), as well as the order dated 13th May, 2022, passed by the appellate authority under Section 107 of the said Act.
3. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts are that the petitioner is a registered tax payer under the provisions of the said Act. The petitioner was served with a notice dated 22nd February, 2021, in From GST DRC-01A, identifying the liability inclusive of interest payable by the petitioner for the tax period April, 2018 to March, 2019, the relevant penalty which may be applied in the case of the petitioner was also included in the said Form GST DRC-01A.
4. Upon receipt of such notice, the petitioner had by a response in writing which is appearing at page 37 of the writ petition admitted that by reasons of a clerical mistake in filing GSTR-09 the petitioner had availed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.