IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
KRISHNA RAO, J.
West Bengal Chemical Industries Limited – Petitioner
Versus
M/s. GTZ (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Others – Respondents
IA No. GA 1 of 2023, CS-COM No. 513 of 2024 (Old No. CS 116 of 2023)
Decided On : 25-06-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of petitioner's pharmaceutical patents. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. claims of patent infringement by respondents. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. respondents' arguments against patent validity. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. standards for granting interim injunctions in patent cases. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 5. legal standards and principles governing patent rights and injunctions were reviewed. (Para 34) |
| 6. court's decision denying interim relief. (Para 41 , 42) |
JUDGMENT :
KRISHNA RAO, J.
1. The petitioner is engaged in manufacturing and trading of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (herein after referred to as “API”) and various organic chemicals since 1988. The petitioner being API Pharmaceutical manufacturing company which researches, produces, develops and markets its own pharmaceutical products and is focused on finding new pharmaceutical solutions and delivering high quality products, driving scientific excellence through its R&D and helping the people through its exports around the world.
2. In the present day, the petitioner has innovated treatments for Iron deficiency and Iron deficiency anemia through its innovative R&D in order to help the patients around the world suffering from severe and chronic diseases to lead better and healthier life. The petitioner’s invention was granted patent being no. IN370845. The petitioner is the owner of the registered Indian Patent where FERRIC CARBOXYMALTOSE is protected under the said patent. The petitioner has also applied for a new invention which is an improved version of their mother patent, i.e. IN370845 as described with an application No. 20223302884 which is an ‘IMPROVED FERRIC CARBOXYMALTOSE WITH LESS SIDE -EFFECTS OBTAINED COST -EFFECTIVELY.’ Such patent was granted to the petitioner on 13th June, 2023 being patent No. 434424.
3. The advantages associated with the petitioner’s company inventions being IN370485 and IN434424 both of which are product by process patent and an Iron Replacement Therapy with low toxicity compared to the other therapies of the same footing. The petitioner had filed the granted specifications along with the claims of the suit patent before the Controller of Patent and after examining the same and being satisfied with the invention of the petitioner granted the said patents to the petitioner. The granted claim four of improved product by process for preparation of Ferric Carboxymaltose which has been granted to the petitioner being patent No. IN370845 is a product by process patent affirms that the petitioner has right as a patentee on a pharmaceutical composition for the treatment of iron deficiency by parental administration comprising more than 90% Ferric Carboxymaltose prepared by process as claimed in claim 1 having molecular weight of 82KDA with Iron content 34.55% and less than 10% Ferric Carboxymaltose component having molecular weight less than 10,000Da” and further the patent of addition to the said granted mother patent of the petitioner i.e. improved Ferric Carboxymaltose with less side effects obtained cost effectively which has been granted to the petitioner being patent no. IN434424 is also a product by process patent affirms that the petitioner has their right as a patentee over such granted patents.
4. The petitioner claims that the pharmaceutical composition is considered to be novel having the following characteristics:
(b) Iron content 34.55%
(c) Less than 10% Ferric Carboxyl complex molecular weight less than 10,000 D.A.
5. The petitioner reiterates that it had undertaken extensive R&D to develop novel “FERRIC CABOXYMALTOSE” improved in terms of efficacy and yield/purity produced by a novel and a cost-effective process and it has recently received approval for manufacturing and marketing of its novel and improved efficient “FERRIC CARBOXYMALTOSE” from the Drug Control on 18th November, 2021.
6. Sometimes on or around 12th December, 2022, the petitio
Bishwanath Prasad Radhey Shyam v. Hindustan Metal Industries
Patent infringement requires the plaintiff to prove unauthorized use of a patented process, while the validity of the patent must meet criteria of novelty, description, and utility.
Intellectual Property - Infringement of Indian Patent - Guidelines of Patent Office, as also manual of Patent Office, are relied upon to argue that whenever there is an improvement of a product or pr....
The court's decision was based on the lack of evidence of infringement by the defendants before the expiry of the patent.
A patent rejection must be a reasoned order that explicitly analyzes prior art and demonstrates why a person skilled in the art would be motivated to combine teachings to arrive at the claimed invent....
The scope of an invention is defined and determined by the granted claims.
The scope of patent claims is defined by the claims themselves; any pharmaceutical composition containing the claimed ingredients constitutes infringement, regardless of the specific formulation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.