SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1935 Supreme(Cal) 233

In the goods of Raj Krishna Mukherji, deceased @RESPONDENT – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

McNair, J. - This is an application by Srimati Bidyutlata Debi for an order that the caveat entered in the goods of Raj Krishna Mukherji, deceased, by Amulya, Kumar Mukherji, be discharged. On the 28th September, 1934, probate of the Will of the deceased was granted to the Petitioner by this Court. On the 12th December, 1934, the present caveator applied for a revocation of the grant, and for the Will to be set aside, or proved in his presence. That application was decided by me on the 21st January, 1935, and was dismissed. In that application Amulya contended that the grant should be revoked on the ground that it was obtained surreptitiously, that he knew nothing of his rights, nor of the fact that probate had been applied for. He alleged that the Will was forged, and he denied the contention which had been set up by the other side that he was deaf and dumb from birth. On that application I held on the facts presented to me in the affidavits that Amulya had, at the time when probate was applied for, a clear knowledge of his rights and a definite opinion that it was useless trying to oppose the grant of probate, and I dismissed his application.

2. On the same day there was a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top