SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1936 Supreme(Cal) 133

MUKERJI, S. K. GHOSE, LORT-WILLIAMS
In Re: N, an Advocate – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. Mr. Niharendra Dutt Mazumdar, a Barrister of the Middle Temple, was enrolled under the Bar Councils Act, on January 11, 1933, and was admitted as an Advocate of this Court, his name being entered in the roll of Advocates entitled to appear and plead on the original side of the Court on January 17, 1933. It is his case that soon after his enrolment as aforesaid, he began to take a prominent part in Labour and Trade Union movements and became, as he says, an ''Honorary Trustee," some sort of a principal officer of a Trade Union of the labourers of the Port and Docks of Calcutta registered under the Indian Trade Unions Act of 1926, In 1934 between March 3 and December 2, he delivered a number of speeches at certain meetings of the Union held at public places. For three of the speeches, said to have been made on March 3, 4 and 18, respectively, proceedings u/s 107, Criminal Procedure Code, were taken against him and the Magistrate ordered him to be bound over to keep the peace for one year, and this order was affirmed by this Court on appeal. For three other speeches, made respectively on April 29, November 11, and December 2, the Magistrate convicted him in three separate c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top