SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1912 Supreme(Cal) 40

BEACHCROFT, ASUTOSH MOOKERJEE
Baikantha Nath Chakravarti – Appellant
Versus
Kashi Nath Pandit – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. This is an appeal on behalf of the defendant in a suit for declaration of title to Immovable property and for recovery of possession thereof. The disputed property admittedly belonged originally to one Dhir Naran Pandey. On the 8th May 1903, Dhir Naran made a gift of this property to his daughter, Annoda Dasi. On the 4th June 1905, Dhir Naran made a testamantary disposition in favour of his son-in-law, Radha Madhab Bera. Annoda Das died on the 12th January 1906. Dhir Naran himself died in January 1908. Shortly after, on the 13th May 1908, Radha Madhab Bera sold the disputed property to the defendant. The case for the plaintiff is that the property formed part of the estate of Dhir Naran at the time of his death, either because the gift was fictitious and inoperative or because, assuming the gift to be genuine, the property reverted to Dhir Naran as heir to the donee, his daughter, and that in either view, the plaintiff is entitled, as the nephew of Dhir Naran, to take the property by right of inheritance, as there was no disposition of it by the Will. The defendant resists the claim on three grounds; first, that upon the death of Annoda Dasi, the property vested not in h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top