SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1936 Supreme(Cal) 14

R. C. MITTER
Abdul Latif – Appellant
Versus
J. R. Percival, Receiver – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R.C. Mitter, J. - The appellant before me got a decree for money against one Abdul Hamid on 4th November 1933. Later on, on 22nd December 1933, the said Abdul Hamid was adjudicated an insolvent on the application of another creditor and the respondent, Mr. Percival, was appointed Receiver. He however failed to apply for his discharge with the result that on 15th August 1934 his adjudication was annulled. On that date, however, the Court did not vest his properties in any person, but later on a creditor moved the learned District Judge for making an order u/s 37, Provincial Insolvency Act, for vesting his properties in a person to be appointed by him. The learned District Judge on 18th September 1934, made such an order appointing Mr. Percival, as the person in whom the properties are to vest. The appellant before me filed an application for execution of his decree against Abdul Hamid on 28th January 1935, in the 4th Court of the Munsif at Chittagong. In the said application he prayed for sale of some Immovable properties which according to the purport of the aforesaid order of the learned District Judge dated 18th September 1934, had vested in Mr. Percival. Mr. Percival fil

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top