SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1943 Supreme(Cal) 113

DERBYSHIRE, MITTER, LODGE
RALEIGH INVESTMENT CO. , LTD. – Appellant
Versus
GOVERNOR-GENERAL IN COUNCIL. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

DERBYSHIRE, C.J. - This matter originally came before McNair, J., who referred it to the Chief Justice, under rule 3 of Chapter V of the Original Side Rules which is as follows :-

"Where it shall appear to any judge at any stage of a suit, application or other matter, that it involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Government of India Act, 1935, or any order in council made thereunder, he shall report to that effect to the Chief Justice, who shall constitute a Bench of two or more judges to hear the suit, application or other matter."

Put shortly the plaintiffs claim that certain provisions of the Indian income tax Act of 1922 as amended by the income tax Act of 1939 are beyond the law making powers of the Indian central Legislature and that in consequence certain money they have paid under protest to the Government of India as income tax under the protest to the Government of India as income tax under the said provision was not legally payable by them; they claim a declaration that the said provision are ultra vires and ask for a return of the money so paid and other reliefs.

The defendants in their written statement have pleaded Section 226 of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top