SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1869 Supreme(Cal) 136

Beicha Namdar – Appellant
Versus
Jalu Namdar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Norman, J. - In this case the appellants, who are the defendants, claim a right under a lease granted by the proprietor to take the juice of 320 date-trees in Mauza Sunhowli. The plaintiff claims under a similar lease of an earlier date, which is unregistered. The appellants contend that their lease, though later in date, is entitled to priority over that of the plaintiff, inasmuch as it is registered. Section 50 of Act XX of 1866 enacts as follows: "Every instrument) of the kinds mentioned in clauses 1, 2 and 3 of section 18 shall, if duly registered, take effect, as regards the property comprised therein, against every unregistered instrument relating to the same property." Now the right to take the juice of the date-trees will not fall within section 18, clause 1, unless it is a right or interest to immoveable property. Looking to the definition of immoveable property, in the second section of the Act, it excludes "standing timber and growing crops." The definition of moveable property in the same section includes "growing crops, grass, fruit upon trees, and property of every other description, except immoveable property."

2. The question is, does the right to cut date-tr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top