SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1912 Supreme(Cal) 233

STEPHEN, RICHARDSON
Mandhyan Sheikiya – Appellant
Versus
Badram Dalni – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. This is an appeal from an order of the District Judge of Assam Valley District. A decree was passed on the 16th April 1897. On the 22nd February 1909, execution was commenced and it was ordered that the land should be attached and proclamation should be issued, the 15th of April being fixed for the date of the proclamation. On the 15th April, the proclamation not having been made, an order was passed proclamation not filed, struck off." In our opinion and under the circumstances of this case, this amounted to a dismissal of the attachment and if any further attachment proceedings were to be taken out, they would have to be taken before the 15th April 1909. No further proceedings were attempted until the 13th August 1909 when fresh proceedings for attachment were commenced. These further proceedings were out of time and, consequently, were infructuous.

2. The result is that the order of the 16th February 1910, which by some oversight has cot been supplied to us, but which, (sic) understand, was a fresh application for execution, was out of time, and the order of the lower Appellate Court was, consequently, right.

3. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with costs, the hearin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top