SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1882 Supreme(Cal) 62

MACPHERSON, MACLEAN
Tamiz Mandal – Appellant
Versus
Umid Karigar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Maclean, J. - It would have been better had the Assistant Magistrate followed the course pointed out by the presiding Judge in the case of. The Empress v. Partab 1 as the proper course to be adopted.

2. We direct that the order passed u/s 505 of the Criminal Procedure Code be set aside, and leave it to the Assistant Magistrate to follow the course prescribed in Section 504, Clause 2, if he thinks proper.

1 I.L.R., 1 All., 666. In this case Spankie, J., said: "In making an order for security for good behaviour, I presume that the Magistrate holds the powers of a first class Magistrate, and that ha was acting u/s 505 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. I have some doubt whether the Magistrate had adduced before him such evidence as to general character as to justify his dealing with the accused for the offence of which he found he was guilty, and in the record of the trial I find no evidence from which it could be gathered that the accused was by repute a receiver of stolen property. But the prisoner certainly allowed that he had been punished twice for theft, and here he was again tried and found guilty of receiving stolen property. I am therefore unwilling to disturb the order

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top