SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(Cal) 484

Dwarkadas and Co. – Appellant
Versus
Daluram Goganmull – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Harries, C.J. - This appeal was referred to a Full Bench for decision of a Bench of this Court by an order dated April 5, 1949. In the referring order two questions are propounded, namely,

2. In the circumstances of this case was the arbitration clause contained in the contract between Bubna More & Co. and the Respondents imported into the contract made between the Respondents and the Appellants?

3. Which of the two decisions, namely, Chatturbhuj Chandunmull v. Basdeodas Daga, ILR 47 Cal 799 (1920) and Haji Vali Mahomed Ayoob v. Shamdeo Gopiram, 34 CWN 447 (1930) is correctly decided?

4. To appreciate the points in issue in this appeal it will be necessary shortly to set out the facts.

5. By a contract Indent No.73 dated December 13, 1947, firm known as Bubna More & Co. sold to the Respondents in this appeal two lacs yards of American O.D. Cotton Merquisetts Olive Colour 48" wide at Re. 1-1-6 per yard.

6. By the contract the sellers were to deliver the goods to the buyers or their nominees as and when released by the Textile Controller, Calcutta, and the buyers were bound to accept delivery accordingly. The buyers were under an obligation to take delivery of the goods within a w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top