SANDERSON, PANTON
Ram Gopal Goenka – Appellant
Versus
Corporation of Calcutta – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sanderson, C.J. - This was a Rule issued by my learned Brothers Mr. Justice Newbould and Mr. Justice Bepin Behary Ghose calling upon the Municipal Magistrate and on the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation of Calcutta to show cause, why the order complained of should not be set aside or such other order made as to this Court might seem fit and proper.
2. The order complained of was an order made by the Municipal Magistrate of Calcutta, dated the 28th of February 1925, by which the Magistrate directed the demolition of certain unauthorized structures by the Corporation of Calcutta at the expense of the owner.
3. The proceedings in this case present some peculiarities. The alleged unauthorized structures were made before the 1st of April 1924. The notice which was served upon the petitioner was headed " Section 364 Act III (B. C.) of 1923 (i. e.. the Calcutta Municipal Act of 1923, which came into force on the 1st of April 1924) The notice was to the effect that the petitioner was directed to appear to show cause before the Municipal Magistrate of Calcutta, why an order should not be made u/s 364 of Act III (B. C.) of 1923, directing that so much of the building as had be
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.