SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1915 Supreme(Cal) 288

MULLICK, HOLMWOOD
Kartick Chandra Das – Appellant
Versus
Satya Sree Ghosal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. This is an appeal after remand from the judgment and decree of the learned Subordinate Judge of the 24-Pergannahs, who agreeing with the Court of first instance has decreed the plaintiffs' suit for ejectment of the defendants. The defendants claimed a permanent right in the land which is situated in Kidderpore, a suburb of Calcutta. They alleged that they had acquired such a right By long possession beyond the memory of man at a fixed rent and that their predecessors had erected permanent structures on the land. In the first appeal from the Munsif's judgment which was heard by another Subordinate Judge, it was held that the kabuliat set up by the plaintiffs of the year 1301 was a forgery and that the defendants were entitled to the presumption from long possession and from the existence of permanent structures and he accordingly dismissed the plaintiffs' suit. The plaintiffs appealed to this Court and the appeal was heard by Jenkins, C.J., and Nalini Ranjan Chatterjea, J., who remanded the case reversing the decree of the lower Appellate Court and sending back the appeal for re-hearing in the light of the remarks they had made. Those remarks were chiefly two in number, f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top