SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1929 Supreme(Cal) 258

PANTON, B. B. GHOSE
(Dewan) Abdul Alim – Appellant
Versus
Amatul Bibi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B.B. Ghose, J. - This is an appeal by defendant 1 against the final decree made by the Court below with reference to mesne profits. The plaintiffs brought a suit for recovery of immovable properties with mesne profits included in four schedules attached to their plaint. The suit for the properties included in Schedules 1, 2 and 3 was dismissed. The plaintiffs obtained a decree for the properties included in Schedule 4. This decree is dated 31st March 1908. The defendants did not appeal against that decree but the plaintiffs appealed against that portion of the claim which was dismissed by the trial Court to the High Court that is, with reference to the properties included in Schedules 1, 2 and 3. That appeal was dismissed by the High Court on 25th June 1912. The plaintiffs preferred a further appeal to the Privy Council which was also dismissed on 20th January 1920. The plaintiffs then sought for execution of the decree with regard to the properties in the fourth schedule to the plaint on 8th December 1922.

2. The present appellant raised the question that the execution was barred by limitation. This was decided against the defendants by a decision of this, Court to which I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top