SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1926 Supreme(Cal) 99

Hemendra Prasad Ghose – Appellant
Versus
King-Emperor – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The petitioners who have obtained the present Rule are the editor, the printer and the publisher of the Bengali newspaper called Dainik Basumati. On the 23rd April 1926 an item headed "Telegram to the Nakhoda Mosque" was published in a conspicuous position at the top of a column. The petitioners were thereupon charged before the Chief Presidency Magistrate with having committed an offence u/s 153A of the I.P.C. The defence taken was that they published the telegram to draw the attention of the authorities to a piece of information received from a reliable source so that they might trace the persons responsible for the disturbances and find some means of securing peace between the two communities.

2. The learned Chief Presidency Magistrates took the view that the publication of this telegram did not fall within the explanation of Section 153A. But having regard to the circumstances of the case he came to the conclusion that it would be sufficient to deal with the petitioners u/s 562 of the Criminal P.C., and dismissed them with a warning not to publish rumours of this nature in future particularly at a time of tension. The telegram in question is in these terms:

It is rumou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top