SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1878 Supreme(Cal) 181

MCDONELL, AINSLIE
Syud Mahomet Hossein – Appellant
Versus
Hadzi Abdullah – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Ainslie, J. - The Registrar of Deeds having refused to register a certain document, an application was made in 1872 to the District Judge under Act VIII of 1871. On 23rd August 1872 the District Judge rejected the petition on the ground that the execution of the deed had not been proved. In September 1872 Reasut Hossein applied for a review of judgment, and on the 19th September 1872 the District Judge issued a rule calling upon the opposite party to show cause why the review should not he admitted. On the 4th January 1873 the rule was made absolute, the review admitted, and the cause sot down for further hearing. This order of the 4th January 1873, therefore, had the effect of cancelling the original order of the Judge and re-opening the proceedings commenced by the petitioner in 1872 u/s 74 of Act VIII of 1871.

2. The final order of the Judge on that application was made on 20th December 1877, when Act VIII of 1871 had been repealed. It was entitled as a review of judgment in suit No. 1 of 1872. By Section 2 of Act III of 1877, which came into force on the 21st April 1877, Act VIII of 1871. was repealed; but by the provisions of the General Clauses Act (Act I of 1868, Sect

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top