SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1927 Supreme(Cal) 156

RANKIN, CHOTZNER
Suresh Chandra Banerjee – Appellant
Versus
King-Emperor – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Chotzner, J. - The 20 appellants were tried by the Additional Sessions Judge of Dacca with a jury upon a charge u/s 400, I.P.C., and upon the unanimous verdict of the jury were convicted and sentenced to various terms of imprisonment. The trial presents some unusual features. It began on 15th April 1925 and ended on 9th June. 1926. Over 300 witnesses were examined and the amount of judicial time actually devoted to the hearing was 154 days. The learned Judge's charge to the jury which occupied 8 days dealt very exhaustively with the law and with the facts in their relation to each particular accused and reflects great credit on the patience, industry and carefulness of the learned Judge.

2. At the hearing of the appeal, the appellants Suresh Chandra Banerji alias Fatik, Bhim Dhupi, Gunga Charan Dutt alias Haridas. Abala Ranjan Majumdar, Nalini Ranjan Majumdar and Bama Charan Chaudhuri alias Tuina were represented by Mr. Taluqdar, Nripendra Nath Ghose alias Natu by Mr. Bhattacharjee, while the remaining (13) accused have preferred appeals from jail.

3. The case for the prosecution rests very largely on the evidence of the approver Surendra Mohan Ghose. According to him the app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top