SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1909 Supreme(Cal) 59

RYVES, CHATTERJEE
Abdullah Khan – Appellant
Versus
Emperor – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Chatterjee, J. - In this case the petitioner has been convicted u/s 193 of the Indian Penal Code for giving false evidence in the course of a judicial proceeding. The nature of that judicial proceeding was as follows. The Assistant Settlement Officer made an inquiry u/s 476 of the Criminal Procedure Code as to whether he should or should not order the prosecution of certain persons for filing false receipts in the course of a settlement proceeding before him. The petitioner is said to have given false evidence in that inquiry. The petitioner obtained a Rule on the District Magistrate to show cause why the sentence passed upon him should not be set aside on the ground that the proceeding u/s 476 of the Criminal Procedure Code was not a judicial proceeding. "Judicial proceeding" has been defined in Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, and it includes any proceeding in the course of which evidence is or may legally be taken on oath. Now, in order to see in what proceeding evidence can be taken on oath, we must refer to the Oaths' Act. Section 4 of Act X of 1873 lays down that all Courts and persons having by law or consent of parties authority to receive evidence are enti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top