SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1924 Supreme(Cal) 344

C. C. GHOSE
In Re: Harsukhdas Balkissendas – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

C.C. Ghose, J. - This is an application for an order that the firm of Chowdhury & Co., may be adjudicated as insolvents.

2. The facts which have been opened before me by learned Counsel who appeared in support of the application are as follows : On the 21st August, 1923, a decree was obtained in suit No. 2239 of 1923 by Messrs. Hursukdas Balkissendas who are the petitioning creditors for a sum of Rs. 10,000, being the amount due on a hundi executed on the 4th May, 1923 by Messrs. Chowdhury & Co. In execution of the said decree; the decree-holders applied for leave to attach certain properties belonging to the judgment-debtors and then in the hands of Mr. R.N. Mitter, Barristerat-Law, who had been appointed Receiver in another suit of the assets belonging to Messrs. Chowdhury & Co. On or about the 29tb November, 1923, the Receiver was served with a notice requiring him not to part with certain articles of furniture which had been attached by the decree-holders in execution of the said decree, until the further orders of this court. The attachment was levied on the 30th November, 1923. On the 13th December, 1923, the decree-holders applied for and obtained an order from this C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top