SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1923 Supreme(Cal) 266

SANDERSON, RICHARDSON, PANTON, CUMING, CHATTERJEA, BUCKLAND
Government of Assam – Appellant
Versus
Sahebulla – Respondent


ORDER

Buckland, J. - This is an appeal by the Government of Assam against a judgment of the senior Extra Assistant Commissioner at Dhubri acquitting 12 persons charged u/s 147, Indian Penal Code, as members of an unlawful assembly, the common object of which was to resist the execution of a warrant of arrest.

2. For the present purpose a bare outline of the facts suffices, for there has been no decision upon the merits and this appeal turns wholly upon a question of law and if it succeeds a remand is inevitable.

3. Certain constables were deputed to execute a warrant of arrest against a recalcitrant witness of the name of Sanaka Bibi in connection with a criminal case in the Court of the Extra Assistant Commissioner. The execution of the warrant was resisted, and the learned Judge has held that the warrant was illegally issued with the consequence that the resistance did not amount to an offence. The warrant was issued u/s 90 of the Criminal Procedure Code, but it appears that the Court by which it was issued did not record in writing its reasons for issuing. What has now to be considered is whether a warrant issued in such circumstances is or is not a valid warrant.

4. The learned Adv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top