SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1942 Supreme(Cal) 141

BLANK, B. K. MUKHERJEA
Khagendra Nath Banerjee – Appellant
Versus
Sm. Rani Harshamukhi Dassi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B.K. Mukherjea, J. - This appeal arises out of a suit brought by the original plaintiff Rani Harsha Mukhi, now respondent l, for recovery of rents and cesses including drainage cesses due in respect of a tenure held by the defendants-appellants under the plaintiff and her cosharer. The only dispute was with regard to drainage cesses which were claimed by the plaintiff at the rate of Rupees 121-8-8 per annum for the years 1340 to 1342 less the amount paid and credited. The Administrator General, Bengal (now respondent 2) who as cosharer landlord was made a pro forma defendant, subsequently got himself transferred to the category of a co-plaintiff and laid claim to drainage cesses at the same rate for his share, for the years 1339-1342 B. Section Damages were also claimed by both the plaintiffs. The claim for recovery of drainage cesses was based upon Section 23, Bengal Sanitary Drainage Act (Bengal Act 8 of 189S). This Act has been repealed by the Bengal Agricultural and Sanitary Improvement Act (Bengal Act 6 of 1920); but its operation is saved in the present context by the first proviso to Section 36 of the latter Act. To appreciate the point in controversy between the par

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top