SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1891 Supreme(Cal) 57

W. COMER PETHERAM, AMEER ALI
In Re: Sheoraj Nandan Singh – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

W. Comer Petheram, Kt., C.J. - We think that this rule must be made absolute. The rule arises out of an application for the attachment of certain properties which are claimed by the applicant to answer the judgment at the suit of the Manager of the Tikari Raj, against a lady of the name of Janki Kooer, and this property has been attached in the hands of the present applicant by the present decree-holder on the ground that it was originally the property of the judgment-debtor. It was transferred by her to the present applicant, the consideration for the transfer being an annuity payable by the transferee to her, and also an agreement on his part to discharge certain debts due by her including (it was contended) the debt in question in respect of which this claim is made.

2. The Subordinate Judge has directed that this property should be sold to answer that claim, on the ground that by that document which transfers the property the present applicant does agree to pay this debt, and in consequence of that he became a trustee of the property for the judgment-debtor, and consequently the property was liable to attachment in his hands.

3. Assuming that the view of the meaning of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top