SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1875 Supreme(Cal) 9

Shurrut Chunder Alias Bholanath Chuttopadhya – Appellant
Versus
Rajkissen Mookerjee – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Macpherson, Officiating C.J.

1. There is but one point raised in this special appeal. The plaintiff seeks to set aside a sale made during his minority by his elder brother Ashootosh Chatterjee, who was his guardian appointed by the Court under Act XL of 1858. The Court below has found that the purchaser (the respondent) did not act fraudulently in the matter; that he gave a fair price; and that the condition of the estate necessitated a sale, The question is whether such a sale is had, and can now be set aside for the one reason that the sanction of the Court, which s. 18 of Act XL of 1858 declares necessary, was never obtained.

2. S. 18 enacts that every person to whom a certificate shall have been granted "may exercise the same powers in the management of the estate as might have been exercised by the proprietor if not a minor; and may collect and pay all just claims, debts and liabilities due to or by the estate of the minor. But no such person shall have power to sell or mortgage any immoveable property, or to grant a lease thereof for any period exceeding five years, without an order of the Civil Court previously obtained." This is not a simple direction that the sanctio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top