SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1923 Supreme(Cal) 320

Abinash Chandra Roy – Appellant
Versus
Fulchand Chaudhuri – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The plaintiffs are the appellants before us and the facts, which have given rise to this appeal are, shortly stated, as follows:

The plaintiffs, who are the landlords, instituted a suit, being Suit No. 984 of 1919, in the Court of the Munsif at Dubrajpur, for recovery of arrears of rent for the years 1322 to 1325 B.S. The jote, in respect of which the arrears of rent were claimed, stood in the names of two persons named Miran and Bishnu Chaudhuri. The parties, who were made defendants in the suit, contended that all the heirs of the said two recorded tenants had not been made defendants and accordingly the suit was incompetent.

2. The Court of first instance found that all the heirs of the said two recorded tenants were in possession of the jote, and that a son of Bishnu Chaudhuri and the heirs of other sons of Bishnu Chaudhuri and heirs of Miran Chaudhuri had not been made parties to the suit, and accordingly dismissed the suit, holding that it was bad for defect of parties.

3. The plaintiffs appealed to the learned District Judge of Birbhum, the appeal being numbered No. 19 of 1920. The lower Appellate Court observed as follows : "Then as regards the facts of the individ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top