JUDGMENT

Sen, J. - This appeal arises out of a suit for setting aside a compromise decree and a sale in execution thereof. The trial Court set aside the sale in execution but refused to set aside the compromise decree. There was an appeal and a cross-objection. The learned Subordinate Judge has upheld the decision of the trial Court refusing to set aside the decree but he has reversed the decision of that Court by which the sale was set aside and he has maintained the sale. Against this decision the Plaintiffs have appealed. The material facts which need be stated briefly are these: The Plaintiffs are Ganesh Chandra Das and his brother Kartick Chandra Das. The latter is a minor and is represented by his mother as next friend. There was a suit instituted against these two brothers for rent with respect to two plots of land. The mother was appointed guardian ad litem in that suit. The Plaintiffs in that suit claimed that Ganesh and Kartick were tenants with respect to two plots of land and that they were liable to pay rent at the rate of Rs. 6 per annum. The suit ended in a decree upon compromise. Ganesh and Kartick were made liable to pay rent at the rate of Rs. 4 per annum and were