SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1945 Supreme(Cal) 203

Manindra Nath Mukkerjee – Appellant
Versus
Mathuradas Chatturbhuj – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Khundkar, J. - This is an action for damages for injury caused to the plaintiff by the fall, from the roof of the defendant's premises, of a cinema advertising device, called a banner, which is an article made of the cloth within a wooden frame. According to the defendant's witness Amitava Roy, the frame is of pinewood 2 inches wide by l/2 an inch thick.

2. The defendant is the proprietor of a motion picture exhibition establishment called the Rupali Cinema situated in Ashutosh Mookerjee Road. The portion of the building which abuts on the street is one-storied. On the roof of this, about four feet from its western edge, overlooking the street, there stands a sky sign which is a more or less permanent structure consisting of a steel frame held firmly in place in an upstanding position by means of masonry and iron attachments. It is 12 feet high by 36 feet wide. On this framework and firmly attached to it in a vertical position there is galvanized iron sheeting, the surface of which, facing westwards towards the street, was intended to carry advertising designs. The galvanized sheeting covers, according to the defendant's manager, B. N. Basu Mullick, the whole surface of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top