SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1878 Supreme(Cal) 192

WHITE, MITTER
Alukmonee Dabee – Appellant
Versus
Banee Madhub Chuckerbutty – Respondent


JUDGMENT

White J.

1. Several questions have been raised by the appellant in this case, but, for the purposes of this appeal, it is only necessary to express our opinion on one of them, which is whether Kali Kumar Chuckerbutty, as the purchaser under a sale in execution of a decree to which I shall presently refer, acquired the interest of Dinobundhu Roy and Bepin Roy, the minor sons and heirs of one Anundmohun Roy, their deceased father, in the three-anna twelve anna share of the jalkar mehal, which is the subject of the suit; for, if the respondents did not acquire their interest, we think that the present suit must fail, notwithstanding that all the other questions raised by the appellant are determined in favour of the respondents. (After stating the facts of the case as above, and finding that the respondent had all along been in actual possession, and that neither Kali Kumar nor his representative had taken any proceedings to obtain actual possession from the Court in charge of the execution of the decree, the learned Judge continued).--Upon this state of facts, it is contended on behalf of the respondents that the decree of 1859 was really a decree against the appellant as repr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top