SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1937 Supreme(Cal) 286

COSTELLO
Rajendra Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Sailendra Kumar Gupta – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Costello, Ag. C.J.

1. This is an appeal against certain orders made by the District Judge of Faridpur in a matter which a is described as Lunacy Act Case No. 23 of 1937. The present proceedings were started on 3rd May 1937 by the presentation of a petition by one Sailendra Kumar Gupta who is the son of Rajendra Kumar Gupta, in which it was alleged that Rajendra Kumar Gupta had become of unsound mind and had been in that condition for some nine or ten months previously. It was stated that the petition had been made "for being appointed guardian of the person and the property of the lunatic." The word used in the translation is "idiot." Certain facts are set forth in the petition and in para. 10 thereof it was prayed that notice should be served on "the idiot," that the records of the case should be perused, there should be an order for an inquisition recorded and the case heard after serving notices upon the near relatives of "the idiot" and the applicant appointed as the guardian of the person and manager of the property of "the idiot". On the same day on which that petition was filed, an order was made by the District Judge in this form:

Heard pleader for the petitioner rega

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top