SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1932 Supreme(Cal) 267

(Syed) Zainuddin Hossain – Appellant
Versus
(Moulvi) Muhammad Abdur Rahim – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The relationship of the parties who figure in this case will appear from the following genealogical tree:

                                   MOHAMED ISMAIL       __________________________________|__________________________________       |                  |              |              |                  |Mohamed Israil       Mohammad         Mohammed     Fatema Bibi        Azimunnessa(predeceased his      Ibrahim       Abdur Rahim     (pro forma         Bibi m, Syed     father)                       plaintiff).   defendant 5).          Tajammal         |                                                                Hossein  Mohamed Gous                                                               |                                      _______________________________________|            __________________________|_______________________________            |               |                   |                     |   Syed Zainuddin   Syed Sharfuddin    Mt. Fakherunnessa     Mt. Zohra Khatun       Hossein            Hossein              Bibi              (pro forma   (defendant 1).    (defendant 2).        (defendant 3).     defendant 4).

2. The plaintiff's case shortly pu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top