SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1880 Supreme(Cal) 163

PONTIFEX, MCDONELL
Bhoopendra Narain Roy – Appellant
Versus
Greesh Narain Roy – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Pontifex, J. - The District Judge in this case has refused to grant an application under Act XXXV of 1858, to declare that one Kasinauth Boy is a lunatic, and to appoint a manager of his estate and guardian of his person. The application was made by the husband of the lunatic's daughter. The family is a Mitakshara family, and consequently the daughter would not inherit the interest of her father in the ancestral property. The Judge has found that in reality the application has been made with a view to taking consequent proceedings for partition. Now it appears, according to the statements of the applicant, that there are two qualities of property in which the lunatic is interested,-first, ancestral estate, which under the Mitakshara law his daughter would not inherit; and secondly, estate said to have been inherited from collaterals, and to have been inherited, not by the family as a joint family, but by the two senior members of the family at the time the inheritance fell in, to the exclusion of members of the family of a lower degree. It has been objected before us, and apparently the Judge seems to have been of opinion, that Act XXXV of 1858 cannot and does not apply to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top