SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1924 Supreme(Cal) 708

PAGE, NEWBOULD, GHOSE
Suresh Chandra Mukerji – Appellant
Versus
Shitikanta Banerjee, – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Woodroffe, J. - This is a suit for declaration of the plaintiff's title to and for recovery of possession of certain lands covering, it is said, 10,000 bighas in area described in the schedule to the plaint. The facts are fully set forth both in the judgment of the learned Subordinate Judge and of my learned brother. I need not, therefore, repeat them except so far as is necessary for explaining the conclusions at which I have arrived.

2. Since the date of the plaint, claim to certain lands has been abandoned. The tract on the east within stations m, n, x, v, 8, 7, 36, 85m in the Commissioner's map was given up in the trial Court, In this Court so much of the disputed land as lies north of the Settlement line of 1904 (which corresponds to the southern banks of the river at the time of Revenue Survey in 1856) was given up. Out of the Lands comprised within the Revenue Survey and the boundary lines of Kabirajpore the plaintiff's title has been found in respect of 15 chaks and the residuary portion of Mouza Kabirajpore. The chaks are numbered 5, 7, 15, 17, 61, 64, 69, 70, 73, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103 and 104. The residue does not bear any number. These 15 chaks and the residue li

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top