SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1928 Supreme(Cal) 393

Nuddea Mills Co. , Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sidheswar Chatterjee – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. This appeal arises out of a suit brought by the plaintiff-respondent against the appellant company and the Naihati Municipality for a declaration of the plaintiff's right of way over a certain public road called Radhaballav Road and for other consequential reliefs. The plaintiff's case is that long ago a temple was built and dedicated by one of his ancestors on Radhaballav Road, a little away from another public road called Ferry Fund Road connected by Radhaballav Road. The plaintiff further claimed easement of necessity over the road. He sought for a further declaration that the act of the Municipality in closing up the road was ultra vires and also for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with his right of way over the road to reach the temple and for a direction on the appellants to remove obstructions put by them across the road. The facts are that there was a road called Radhaballav Road leading from Perry Fund Road westward to the Hooghly; there were houses on both sides of the road all of which except the temple were acquired by the appellant company and they have erected at great cost a jute mill which they are working. The defendant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top