SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1912 Supreme(Cal) 533

HOLMWOOD, ASUTOSH MOOKERJEE
Dwarka Nath Kundu – Appellant
Versus
Mohendra Nath Roy – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. We are invited in this Bale to set aside a decree by which the Small Cause Court has dismissed the suit of the petitioners to recover money paid by them on the 16th August 1910, in satisfaction of a decree obtained against them by the defendant.

2. The circumstances under which the suit was commenced may be briefly stated. On the 28th November 1907, a body of zemindars, who had been described as the Dutts, obtained a decree for arrears of rent against one Beni Madhab, the recorded tenant of a tenure. It appears that on the 21st May 1901, the present defendant, Mohendra Nath Roy, had purchased one-half share of the tenure from Beni Madhab while the other half had vested in the plaintiffs; the name of Bani Madhab, however, continued to be recorded in the books of the landlords. The result was that in execution of the decree for arrears of rent obtained by the landlords, they proceeded to bring the tenure to sale. The defendant, Mohendra Nath Roy, thereupon deposited the decretal amount in Court and saved the property from sale. Subsequently, he brought a suit for contribution against the present plaintiffs on the allegation that one-half of the rent was payable by them, whi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top