SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1933 Supreme(Cal) 359

MITTER, M. C. GHOSE
Midnapur Zamindari Co. , Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Priyabala Dasee – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mitter, J. - This is an appeal by the Midnapur Zamindari Co., Ltd., who are the decree-holders is a certain suit for rent. The appeal arises out of proceedings taken u/s 174, Ben. Ten. Act, to sat aside the sale held in execution of a rent decree obtained by the Midnapur Zamindari Co., Ltd. The respondents, who are judgment-debtors 1 to 3, challenged the sale on three grounds: (1) that there was no service of sale proclamation or any process in the execution case, (2) that the judgment-debtors 2 and 3 were not properly represented in the execution case and (3) that there ware great irregularities in the publication and conduct of the sale.

2. The case of the judgment-debtors was that the processes in execution were fraudulently suppressed by the officers of the decree-holders, and that they came to know of the sale some time in Bhadra or Ashwin, which would correspond to September, and the application to set aside the sale-was made on 12th November. The decree-holders contested the application of the judgment-debtors. They travarsed all the allegations about non-service of sale proclamation and denied that there had been irregularities in the publication of the sale proclama

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top