SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1924 Supreme(Cal) 554

Kayem Biswas – Appellant
Versus
Bahadur Khan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. This appeal is against the judgment and decree of the Additional District Judge of Khulna, reversing a decision of the Munsif of the Additional Court at Khulna and remanding the case for fresh decision in accordance with certain instructions given in the judgment of the lower appellate Court.

2. The Defendant No. 1, Kayem Biswas now appellant, brought a suit in the year 1915 against the plaintiffs-respondents for recovery of possession of certain lands on establishment of title; and obtained an ex-parte decree. The plaintiffs then filed the present suit to set aside the sale decree as fraudulent and without jurisdiction, and for a confirmation of their title to the land, and for other consequential reliefs. A number of issues were framed upon the pleadings, one of which, No. 8, was in the following terms:

Is the decree in Title Suit No. 343 of 1915 fraudulent and without jurisdiction as alleged? Is it liable to be set aside?

3. The Munsif found upon this issue that no fraud had been established, and that there was no substance in the objection as to jurisdict on. He accordingly, in view of his findings on this issue and on Issues 9 and 11, dismissed the suit.

4. On appeal th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top