2002 Supreme(Chh) 55
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
FAIZAN UDDIN
SHYAMA BAI VERMA - Appellant
Versus
UMESH KUMAR - Respondents
M. A. 700 Of 2001
Decided On : July 26, 2002
ABHISHEK SINHA, Saifuddin Rajas
The involvement of the vehicle in the accident establishes liability under section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, and claimants can claim compensation from one of the owners of the vehicles involved.
Headnote:
Motor Vehicles Act - Liability under Section 140 - 140
Fact of the Case:
The appeal is against the rejection of an application for interim award under section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act due to the non-impleadment of the truck driver/owner involved in an accident resulting in the death of a person.
Finding of the Court:
The court analyzed the liability under section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, emphasizing that the involvement of the vehicle in the accident is crucial, and the owners of the vehicles involved are jointly and severally liable to pay compensation for death or permanent disablement.
Issues: The main issue was the liability of the vehicle owner under section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act and the non-impleadment of the truck driver/owner involved in the accident.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the involvement of the vehicle in the accident is sufficient to establish liability under section 140, and the claimants can claim compensation from one of the owners of the vehicles involved, irrespective of negligence.
Final Decision: The appeal was allowed with costs, and the court directed the District Judge to ensure the timely handling of similar matters under section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act.
( 1 ) THIS appeal is against the order dated 26. 7. 2001 passed in Claim case No. 2 of 1999 by the Motor Accidents claims Tribunal, Bilaspur, Link Court, pendra Road whereby the application for interim award under section 140 of the motor Vehicles Act has been rejected on the ground that truck driver/owner have not been impleaded as party respondent.
( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the facts are that on 14. 6. 1998 the husband of appellant No. 1, namely, Suresh Verma along with his relatives was travelling in a jeep bearing No. MP 26 E 0781 belonging to the respondent no. 1 and insured by respondent No. 3. The said vehicle met with an accident on the way near village Keonchi on account of head-on collision with an unidentified truck coming from the opposite direction. The jeep was badly damaged and Suresh verma received serious head injuries and ultimately succumbed to the injuries on 19. 6. 1996. The offending truck fled from the spot.
( 3 ) LEARNED counsel for the appellants submits that the accident had occurred and the person had lost his life. It is submitted that the report was not written as the jeep driver has lodged the report. It is not in dispute that the person was in the jeep and for having tea and tiffin, the vehicle was parked where sufficient space was available and it will be subject-matter of evidence. The claim has been denied on the ground that the jeep driver is not responsible and the owner/driver of another truck because of which the accident occurred was not made as party. It is stated that the offending truck had run away.
( 4 ) LEARNED counsel for the appellants has placed reliance on a decision of the m. P. High Court in Shankar Bhai v. Abdul aziz, 1991 ACJ 704 (MP), where it has been held that the award of interim compensation may be passed against one owner of vehicle involved in accident and the owner of another vehicle also involved in accident need not be impleaded. The mere involvement of the vehicle in accident is sufficient and there is no question of adjudging negligence on the part of the driver.
( 5 ) IN the instant case we are concerned with the liability of section 140 of the motor Vehicles Act. It is relevant here to quote the provisions of section 140 of the motor Vehicles Act, which reads as under:"140. Liability to pay compensation in certain cases on the principle of no fault. (1) Where death or permanent disablement of any person has resulted from an accident arising out of the use of a motor vehicle or motor vehicles, the owner of the vehicle shall or as the case may be, the owners of the vehicles shall, jointly and severally, be liable to pay compensation in respect of such death or disablement in accordance with the provisions of this section. (2) The amount of compensation which shall be payable under sub-section (1)in respect of the death of any person shall be a fixed sum of fifty thousand rupees and the amount of compensation payable under that sub-section in respect of the permanent disablement of any person shall be a fixed sum of twenty-five thousand rupees. (3) In any claim for compensation under sub-section (1), the claimant shall not be required to plead and establish that the death or permanent disablement in respect of which the claim has been made was due to any wrongful act, neglect or default of the owners of the vehicle or vehicles concerned or of any other person. (4) A claim for compensation under sub-section (1) shall not be defeated by reason of any wrongful act, neglect or default of the person in respect of whose death or permanent disablement the claim has been made nor shall the quantum of compensation recoverable in respect of such death or permanent disablement be reduced on the basis of the share of such person in the responsibility for such death or permanent disablement. (5) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (2) regarding death or bodily injury to any person, for which the owner of the vehicle is liable to give compensation for r