DHIRENDRA MISHRA
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
POORANLAL – Respondent
( 2 ) BRIEF facts necessary for adjudication of this appeal are that respondent No. 1 is the owner of matador 407 bearing registration No. M. P. 24-C/1592 which was insured with the appellant. On 18-11-1994 when the insurance policy of the said vehicle was in force, the vehicle was involved in an accident and was severely damaged. An offence under Section 304-A of the Indian Penal code was registered against respondent No. 2. The claimant/respondent No. 1 preferred an application under Section 166 of the Act of 1988 claiming compensation for a sum of rs. 61,428/- for damages caused to his vehicle. The appellant denied the claim of the claimant and raised preliminary objection in his reply, that the application was not maintainable at the inst
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.