SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Chh) 89

SUNIL KUMAR SINHA
BABBAN PRASAD MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
P. S. DIWAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.D.Guru, D.K.Gwalre

( 1 ) WHETHER the advertisement (contained in Annexure-A) amounts to indecent representation of women as defined under The Indecent Representation of women (Prohibition) Act 1986, is a question for consideration in this petition ?

( 2 ) THE brief facts are that an advertisement was published in Daily Navbharat, hindi Edition, Raipur, on 24th April 1996 which relates to some oil and capsule shown to be useful to strengthen the nerves. Their names are shown as Kama Sutra Tel and kam Sutra Capsule. The names of the stockiest/medical stores at Raipur, Durg, bhilai and Rajnandgaon are also published. On one side of the publication, a half size standing photograph of a woman is shown taken in lap of a man from side pose. This was taken as an offending depiction by the complainant/respondent No. 1 herein, who tiled a criminal complaint in the Court of judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhamtari, distt. Raipur (M. P.), now Chhattisgarh, under S. 3/6 of The Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). The Magistrate took cognizance in the matter and after registration of the case under the aforementioned provisions of the Act, issued notices to


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top