SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Chh) 87

S.R.NAYAK
MANOJ KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Narayan Shrivastava, Saurabh Jaiswal, Vinay Harit

( 1 ) THE petitioner is a graduate unemployed youth and a permanent resident of Durg District. He applied to the Railway Administration for grant of licence to function as Railway Travelling Service Agent. In response to his application, he was granted licence to function as Railway Travelling Service agent for a period of 3 years commencing from 3-12-1999 and ending 2-12-2002. Well before the expiry of term of licence. The petitioner made an application to the Senior Divisional Commercial Manager for renewal of the licence for a further period of 3 years from 3-12-2002 to 2-12-2005. Then, came the impugned endorsement dated 26-11-2002 marked as Annexure P-1. It reads as follows :-

SOUTH EASTERN RAILWAY


No com. TC/rtsa. 96/pt. II/02 ??????????? Office of the

Sr. Divisional Manager

Bllaspur Division 26-11-2002,

To

Sri Manoj Kumar.

Paras Complex.

Opp . SB1.

Gurudwara Road .

DURG (CG)


Reg. : Rail Travel Service Agent, Durg

Ref : 1) Your letter No. NIL dated NIL


2) this office letter of even no. dated 25-11-2002.


Dear sir.


With reference to the above, it is to inform you that your application for renewal of RTSA has been examined. As the Railway Administration has already called fo


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top