DHIRENDRA MISHRA, L.C.BHADOO
RANDHIR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) BY this appeal under Section 374 (2) of the Cr. P. C. accused/ appellants namely Randhir, Devdas, Roop singh and Rajesh have questioned the legality of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 28-8-1999 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions judge, Raipur in Sessions Trial No. 416/ 94 whereby learned Additional Sessions judge after holding each of the accused/appellants guilty for commission of offence under Sections 396 and 324 read with Section 34 of the I. P. C. , sentenced them to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- each, in default of payment of fine to further undergo R. I. for one year each, and to undergo R. I. for 3 years respectively. It was further directed that both the sentences shall run concurrently. The accused/appellants are in detention since 1-7-1994 thereby they are in detention round about more than 11 years 6 months.
( 2 ) THE case of the prosecution, as per the Dehati Nalishi (Ex-P/19) lodged by Kishorilal PW.-22 in the police station abhanpur, in brief, necessary for the disposal of this appeal is that in the intervening night of 13th/14th June 1994 kisorilal (PW-22) and his family member
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.