HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
L. C. Bhadoo, Dhirendra Mishra
RANDHIR - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. - Respondents
Crl. Appeal 2465 Of 1999
Decided On : JANUARY 18, 2006
Identification of Accused - Criminal Law - Sections 396, 324, 34 of the I. P. C. - The court discussed the legal provisions related to identification of accused persons in the dark and the necessity for identifying features to be mentioned in the first information report and police statements. The court emphasized the importance of clear vision and opportunity to observe the assailants during the crime, and the necessity for suspects to be identified soon after their arrest. The court found the evidence of identification of the accused persons during the dark night in the torch light to be shaky and lacking corroboration, leading to the conclusion that the prosecution failed to prove the offence against the accused persons beyond reasonable doubt.
Fact of the Case:
The appeal was filed by accused/appellants challenging the judgment of conviction and order of sentence for offences under Sections 396 and 324 read with Section 34 of the I. P. C. The prosecution's case involved a dacoity incident resulting in deaths and injuries to the victims, with the accused persons being identified by the main witness, Kishorilal.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the evidence of identification of the accused persons during the dark night in the torch light to be shaky and lacking corroboration, leading to the conclusion that the prosecution failed to prove the offence against the accused persons beyond reasonable doubt.
Issues: The issues involved the identification of the accused persons in the dark during the dacoity incident, the necessity for identifying features to be mentioned in the first information report and police statements, and the reliability of the witness's identification in the absence of corroboration.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of clear vision and opportunity to observe the assailants during the crime, and the necessity for suspects to be identified soon after their arrest. The court found the evidence of identification of the accused persons during the dark night in the torch light to be shaky and lacking corroboration, leading to the conclusion that the prosecution failed to prove the offence against the accused persons beyond reasonable doubt.
Final Decision: The appeal of accused/appellants namely Randhir, devdas, Roop Singh and Rajesh succeeded, and their conviction and sentence under sections 396 and 324 read with Section 34 of the I. P. C. were set aside. They were ordered to be set at liberty forthwith unless required to be detained in any other case.
( 1 ) BY this appeal under Section 374 (2) of the Cr. P. C. accused/ appellants namely Randhir, Devdas, Roop singh and Rajesh have questioned the legality of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 28-8-1999 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions judge, Raipur in Sessions Trial No. 416/ 94 whereby learned Additional Sessions judge after holding each of the accused/appellants guilty for commission of offence under Sections 396 and 324 read with Section 34 of the I. P. C. , sentenced them to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- each, in default of payment of fine to further undergo R. I. for one year each, and to undergo R. I. for 3 years respectively. It was further directed that both the sentences shall run concurrently. The accused/appellants are in detention since 1-7-1994 thereby they are in detention round about more than 11 years 6 months.
( 2 ) THE case of the prosecution, as per the Dehati Nalishi (Ex-P/19) lodged by Kishorilal PW.-22 in the police station abhanpur, in brief, necessary for the disposal of this appeal is that in the intervening night of 13th/14th June 1994 kisorilal (PW-22) and his family members after taking dinner at about 10 p. m. went for sleep. He was sleeping in the central room, the doors of which were open. His wife Swarnarani (since deceased) and his younger son Raviraja aged about 9 years were sleeping on a cot near the front door. In front hall room his elder son mahendra Singh @ Viki (since deceased)was sleeping on a cot. In last room his daughters namely Rani, second daughter Rakhi @ Switi (since deceased) and their daughter Shweta were sleeping. At about 1 a. m. when the light went off on account of failure of electricity supply, somebody assaulted on his head with an iron rod, as a result of which he fell down on the ground and became unconscious. When he regained consciousness at about 2. 15 a. m. , he saw that 3 persons were standing in his room, each of them having torch, they were taking out ornaments and other goods from the Almirah. They were talking in their language which he was not able to understand. They were searching articles after lighting the torch. They were wearing lower under garments (Chaddi) and upper under garments (Baniyan ). Two persons were of 5 ft. height and third person was 4-1/2 ft. in height. At about 2. 50 a. m. the electric light was restored, therefore, one person covered his face with a Chaddar which was lying on the cot and 3 persons had taken the articles, went in the corridor after closing the door. He after bolting the door from inside started raising cries "save save". Other 2-3 persons were standing outside. After opening the door, he went to the room where Vikki was sleeping, went outside and started raising cries on which his younger son raviraja came near him. There was injury on the head of Vikki, blood was oozing out of it. He was unconscious. Thereafter, he went to the mother of vikki. There was injury on her dead, blood was oozing out of it. She was dead. He also went to the room of his daughters and saw that there was injury on the head of Rani, she was unconscious. There was injury on the head of Switi, blood was oozing out of it. She was dead. There was injury on the head of Shweta, blood was oozing out of it, she was unconscious. Hearing the cries, tulsi Panwala, neighbours Ratan Lal and hotelier came on the scene. They were apprised by him about the incident. They brought Drs. Kukreja and Tiwari. Both the doctors after checking all the persons advised them to go to D. K. Hospital, raipur for treatment. One iron spring plate stained with blood was lying on the dining table which was used as a weapon of offence for the purpose of assaulting.
( 3 ) THE accused persons took away the currency notes of Rs. 70,000/-, golden ornaments weighing 20 Tolas and silver ornaments weighing 10 Tolas. Based on this Dehati Nalishi the Officer in-Charge police Station Mr. Jagdish Prasad register
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.