SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Chh) 28

DHIRENDRA MISHRA, L.C.BHADOO
RANDHIR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Arun Kochar, N.K.CHATTERJI, U.N.S.DEO

L. C. BHADOO, J.


( 1 ) BY this appeal under Section 374 (2) of the Cr. P. C. accused/ appellants namely Randhir, Devdas, Roop singh and Rajesh have questioned the legality of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 28-8-1999 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions judge, Raipur in Sessions Trial No. 416/ 94 whereby learned Additional Sessions judge after holding each of the accused/appellants guilty for commission of offence under Sections 396 and 324 read with Section 34 of the I. P. C. , sentenced them to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- each, in default of payment of fine to further undergo R. I. for one year each, and to undergo R. I. for 3 years respectively. It was further directed that both the sentences shall run concurrently. The accused/appellants are in detention since 1-7-1994 thereby they are in detention round about more than 11 years 6 months.

( 2 ) THE case of the prosecution, as per the Dehati Nalishi (Ex-P/19) lodged by Kishorilal PW.-22 in the police station abhanpur, in brief, necessary for the disposal of this appeal is that in the intervening night of 13th/14th June 1994 kisorilal (PW-22) and his family member





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top