SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Chh) 31

SUNIL KUMAR SINHA
BHUPENDRA DAS VAISHNAVA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SUDHIR BAJPAI, Sudhir Verma


SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application filed under Section 438 of the Cr. P. C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicants, who apprehend their arrest in connection with Crime No. 389/2005 registered at Police Station, kawardha, District Kabirdham (C. G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 452, 294, 323, 506 of the I. P. C. and Section 3 (i) (x) of the Scheduled Castes and scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short Special Act ).

( 2 ) AT the very outset, learned counsel for the State, referring to the memo dated 06. 12. 2005, written by superintendent of Police, District-Kabirdham to the Deputy Superintendent of police A. J. K. Kawardha, submitted that on the direction of the Superintendent of police, which was made on the basis of an application given by the father of the complainant, the offence under the Special Act has been withdrawn by the prosecution and now, the case is registered only under the aforementioned Sections of the IPC and there is no case under the Special Act.

( 3 ) THE case of the prosecution is that the complainant namely, Devesh devdas, a young boy aged about 15 years is a student of Class X. He had some quarrel

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top