SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Chh) 123

V.K.SHRIVASTAVA
RUPENDRA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNA KANHAIYA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.P.GUPTA


( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the order dated 22-11-1995 passed by the District Judge, Rajnandgaon, in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 5/92, reversing the order dated 30-11-1991 in Succession Case No. 6/85 passed by the 1st Civil Judge, Class I, rajnandgaon, who rejected the application filed under Section 372 of the Indian Succession act (for short, "the Act") for grant of succession certificate in favour of the non-applicant No. 1.

( 2 ) FACTS material for disposal of this revision in brief compass are that non-applicant no. 1 Krishna Kanhaiya after the death of Bhanumati Bai who died on 22-11-1984, claiming himself and non-applicant No. 2 being step-brother, to be her legal heirs, filed application for grant of succession certificate in respect of rent for the month of november, 1984, December, 1984 and january, 1985 total Rs. 900/- (Rupees nine hundred ). Non-applicant No. 2 did not appear and remained ex parte. Applicant objected grant of succession certificate in favour of non-applicant No. 1 on the ground that bhanumati Bai during her lifetime executed a Will in his favour, therefore, after her death, he became owner of the property left by her. He never remained tenant of












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top